From the Law Office of H. Candace Gorman
UN’s arbitrary detention group calls for immediate release of Palestinian Abu Zubaydah, saying detention has no basis in law.
...
The UN working group on arbitrary detention (UNWGAD), also declared the UK, among other countries, was “jointly responsible for the torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of Mr Zubaydah” over his more than 20 years in detention. [Of course the US is the main culprit.]
Read the whole article here.
Historian Andy Worthington has covered Guantanamo since the beginning. Every attorney who has represented a man at Guantanamo has at least one copy of his book The Guantanamo Files (one for the office and the other to keep at the secure facility where we work on the cases). The book provided the known information on the men held at the prison and allowed us to figure out the connections (or lack thereof) of the men to each other. Andy has written about my client on several occasions over the years including this piece: Algerian Suffering from PTSD Mistakenly Identified as an Associate of Abu Zubaydah, Is Approved for Release from Guantánamo, and now Andy has written the epilogue here. As far as any of us know Mr. Bakhouche is the only detainee that the military has never provided an accurate photo of. That lack of an accurate photo from the early days is exactly what caused Mr. Bakhouche to be held for more than 21 years. Unfortunately the military never had to explain how it could hold a man when the photo(s) they were using to identify him were of someone else. And of course the pathetic judge in Mr. Bakhouche's case could not have cared less.
Pentagon’s Repatriation of Algerian Leaves 30 Prisoners at
Guantánamo
The
transfer was the sixth of a cleared prisoner in six months in a Biden
administration
Top of Form
Bottom of
Form
A prisoner at Guantánamo Bay’s detention center in 2019.Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times
April 20, 2023, 7:55 a.m. ET
3 MIN READ
GUANTÁNAMO
BAY, Cuba — The U.S. military repatriated a prisoner to Algeria on Thursday who
had been held at Guantánamo without charge for more than two decades, as the
Biden administration continues its efforts to reduce the detainee population at
the Navy base.
The
prisoner, Said bin Brahim bin Umran Bakush, 52, was among about
20 suspected low-level fighters who were swept up by Pakistani security
services in a 2002 raid in Faisalabad on dwellings believed to be Al Qaeda safe
houses. The suspected fighters were ultimately taken to Guantánamo Bay.
His
release leaves only one prisoner captured in the raid still at
the Pentagon prison in Cuba. The others have been transferred or repatriated.
Lawyers who have tried to speak with Mr. Bakush described
him as reclusive. He boycotted hearings where his suitability for release was
reviewed and mostly stayed in his cell at Camp 6, the prison building where
cooperative captives are held and allowed to eat, pray and watch television
together.
H.
Candace Gorman, a defense lawyer based in Chicago who has represented Mr.
Bakush for the past 17 years, said he stopped meeting with her in 2017 or 2018.
He
has never been married and has no children but may have distant family in
Algeria, she said in an email. This year was his 22nd Ramadan in U.S. custody.
At
first, U.S. forces identified the prisoner as a Libyan named Ali Abdul Razzaq,
and that name appeared on his federal court filings. But in time, he identified
himself as Said bin Brahim bin Umran Bakush and said he was Algerian.
By
the time of his 2021 hearing, U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded he
“probably attended basic and advanced training in Afghanistan and later served
as an instructor at an extremist camp prior to his capture.”
A U.S. military officer representing Mr. Bakush’s interests
said “he prefers to be alone and spends a lot of time in his cell,” adding that
he has little education and aspired to
In
2018, lawyers tried to use his case to get federal courts to set a higher
standard for evaluating the intelligence gathered against the men in the
earliest days of Guantánamo Bay. But the effort failed.
They
also argued that, as the detainees approached two decades in custody, the U.S.
government should be required to prove the future dangerousness of a detainee
in a manner more similar to a civil commitment for psychiatric reasons. The
Supreme Court declined to take the case in 2021.
Mr.
Bakush’s repatriation was the sixth transfer in six months by the Biden
administration, which in statements has described each release as consistent
with its goal of “responsibly reducing the detainee population and ultimately
closing the Guantánamo Bay facility.”
Now,
16 of the 30 men held there are eligible for transfers, but require more
complex diplomatic negotiations than the recent repatriations. They include 11
Yemenis, a Libyan and a Somali who, by law, cannot be returned to their homelands.
Negotiations to find nations to take some of those men stretch back to the
Obama administration.
In addition, lawyers for an admitted war criminal, Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, are searching for a nation to
take him as part of a plea deal that would provide him with medical care. Mr.
Hadi, who is in his 60s, is disabled from a deteriorating spine disease and has
undergone six back and neck surgeries at Guantánamo Bay since 2017. Over the
years, 780 men and boys have been held at Guantánamo
Bay, with a maximum population of about 660 in 2003. All were brought there
under the George W. Bush administration.
Fitch just reminded me that I never posted a link to the U.N. Report on Guantanamo published on the 22nd anniversary of the opening of Guantanamo but only released in late March. You can read it here.
Also you can read Carol Rosenberg's report on the report here. (If you have a subscription to the NYT.)
...
In the wake of the supreme court's dreadful Dobbs and Bruen decisions, there's a new demand for historians schooled in 18th century sexual practices, and weaponry, respectively.
The results of Clarence Thomas's gun originalism are everywhere.
In US v Rahimi, a Fifth Circuit panel comprising Trumpistes James C Ho and Cory T Wilson and Reagan appointee Edith Jones put a horrifying gloss on Bruen.
In the initial opinion, written by Wilson, the court ruled threats of imminent domestic violence cannot deprive an offender of his weapon; in a revised opinion, Judge Ho dug the hole even deeper.
Ho is a case-study in Republican judicial manipulation. He was appointed in 2017 to a seat on the 5th circuit vacant since 2013, when a Carter-appointee took senior status. Republicans blocked filling the seat until Trump could appoint a "movement" lawyer.
When Ho was appointed, the former Texas SG already had a reputation as an extreme right-wing lawyer with the Dallas-based First Liberty Institute, the "Christian conservative" legal group that employed Trump-appointed Texas federal judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk.
Ho was vigorously opposed in the US Senate, not least for his part in the Torture Memos: he wrote a pro-torture memo for Assistant AG Jay Bybee (now a 9th circuit judge) in 2002 when both were employed by the Justice Department.
Ho's memo Possible Interpretations of Common Article 3 of the 1949 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, falsely claimed the Convention Against Torture (CAT) "distinguishes between torture and other acts of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment".
This was cited by Bybee in his infamous memo, Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under [the US Torture Act].
Bybee's still-shocking memo (mostly by John Yoo) concluded that, notwithstanding US obligations under the CAT, the Torture Act reached only the most "extreme" and "heinous" acts, those causing pain "akin to that which accompanies physical injury such as death or organ failure".
This advice led directly to CIA torture overseas, while the US also failed to fulfil its CAT obligations at Guantánamo, according to a newly-published review of detainee treatment by the UN Rapporteur.
READ THE WHOLE FITCH HERE.
Posts
