Thursday, May 22, 2008
So what is going on at the Solicitor General's office?
Is it just me or do others think there is more to this than just wanting to spend time with their families?
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
No torture, No exceptions
“No Torture. No Exceptions” means:
Reaffirming America’s commitment to existing federal laws and international treaties that ban torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under all circumstances.
Renouncing all legal interpretations and executive orders that redefine torture and permit such acts as sensory or sleep deprivation, stress positions, sexual humiliation, mock executions.
Enforcing full transparency of information about how America treats any and all detainees held by our personnel and those in our employ anywhere in the world.
Rejecting and abolishing the practice of rendering detainees abroad.
Establishing a single standard of interrogation procedures to apply to all persons held in U.S. custody or by those under U.S. control, whether C.I.A., military, or civilian.
Treating our detainees as we would have others treat detained Americans.
Released Detainee testifies to Congressional Committee via satellite link
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
"Looking alive but actually dead"
Links are below thanks to Charles Gittings at the Project to enforce the Geneva Conventions (www.pegc.us) who posted the articles so that I could link to them..
http://www.pegc.us/archive/Organizations/CCR_Foreign_Int_200805.pdf
http://www.pegc.us/archive/Organizations/CCR_Solitary_Conf_200805.pdf
Sunday, May 18, 2008
Hamdan trial delayed
Fortunately the military saw the folly in going forward at this juncture and late in the day on Friday (after the DC Circuit Court refused to act) an order was entered to delay the trial to avoid "the potential embarrassment, waste of resources and prejudice to the accused that would result were the Bush administration to lose the Supreme Court case." How clever of the military to think of that.
Click on the title to read the story from the Miami Herald.
Thursday, May 15, 2008
A NEW LOW (Updated)
Update: The court decided it doesn't have jurisdiction over this... screwing the attorneys once again.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
New Documents Released to ACLU
According to the ACLU press release " Uncensored documents released ... shed light on the deaths of detainees in Iraq and internal disagreement within the military over harsh interrogation practices used at Guantánamo Bay....
The documents contains new information about the deaths of some of these prisoners, including details about Farhad Mohamed, who had contusions under his eyes and the bottom of his chin, a swollen nose, cuts and large bumps on his forehead when he died in Mosul in 2004. The document also includes details about Naem Sadoon Hatab, a 52-year-old Iraqi man who was strangled to death at the Whitehorse detainment facility in Nasiriyah in June 2003; the shooting death of Hemdan El Gashame in Nasiriyah in March 2003; and the death of Manadel Jamadi during an interrogation after his head was beaten with a stove at Abu Ghraib in November 2003.
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
INTERESTING DEVELOPMENTS
The other interesting development is that on the heels of this dismissal the government buried the dismissal with the announcement (again) of charges against five defendants who all seem to be charged as the 20th hijacker...
a most crowded spot... as I believe Al Qahtani was also suspected as holding that same ticket.
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Fridays military decision ousting Hartman for now
Saturday, May 10, 2008
And Back to the Kangaroo Court
Supreme Court... If you are out there please rule soon and put them out of their misery.
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Return to the battlefield?? Updated
I am sure there are those of you who think we should try to ascertain everyone who has harbored ill thoughts about our government and lock them up... but that is not the american way... at least not the america I knew. We have trials. We determine guilt or innocence and then we punish the guilty. Perhaps if a system had been put in place when this man was held the outcome would have been different. Lastly I would just point out that this man was released because of a political deal between the US and Kuwait... the same way every man has been released so far... political deals, not court processes.
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
Update on Transfers last week...
Thank You Sami for remaining a reporter til the end...--Thank You Kent Spriggs for this nice little chart.... the three men with less information did not have counsel. unfortunately I am having formatting trouble... I will get back to this...
| | 2008 MAY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| WAKIL, HAJI SAHIB ROHULLAH | | 798 | | TRANS 5/2 | Jalalabad, AF | 1/1/1962 | 05-cv-01124 | | | | Dechert LLP | Peter Ryan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ABDULLA MOHAMMED KAHN | | 556 | Uzbek | TRANS 5/2 | | | | | | Yes | FD, NJ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| SANGARYAR, RAHMATULLAH | | 890 | | TRANS 5/2 | Oruzgan, AF | 1/1/1968 | 05-cv-00878 | | | Yes, long journey | FD, ND Ga | Matthew Dodge | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NASRULLAH, FNU | | 886 | | TRANS 5/2 | Oruzgan, AF | 1/1/1979 | | | | | FD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ESMATULLA, FNU | | 888 | | TRANS 5/2 | Dekundie, AF | 1/1/1977 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SURVEILLANCE??
Lawyers for Guantánamo Inmates Accuse U.S. of Eavesdropping
By WILLIAM GLABERSON <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/william_glaberson/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
One lawyer for Guantánamo <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/national/usstatesterritoriesandpossessions/guantanamobaynavalbasecuba/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> detainees said he replaced his office telephone in Washington because of sounds that convinced him it had been bugged. Another lawyer who represents detainees said he sometimes had other lawyers call his corporate clients to foil any government eavesdroppers.
In interviews and a court filing Tuesday, lawyers for detainees at Guantánamo said they believed government agents had monitored their conversations. The assertions are the most specific to date by Guantánamo lawyers that officials may be violating legal principles that have generally kept government agents from eavesdropping on lawyers.
“I think they are listening to my telephone calls all the time,” said John A. Chandler, a prominent lawyer in Atlanta and Army veteran who represents six Guantánamo detainees.
Several of the lawyers, including partners at large corporate law firms, said the concerns had changed the way they went about their work apart from Guantánamo cases. A lawyer in Chicago, H. Candace Gorman, said in an affidavit that she was no longer accepting new clients of any type because she could not assure them of confidentiality.
CLICK ON THE TITLE TO FINISH THE STORY
Monday, May 5, 2008
Guantantamo our 51st State?
The world slaps us with Guantanamo as though it's a sack of wet nickels. Guantanamo is an albatross, wrapped in a scarlet letter, inside an Alcatraz. What to do with Guantanamo?
The Supreme Court is mulling the question. The president and the secretary of defense say they want to close Guantanamo. All three presidential candidates and five former U.S. secretaries of state want to close Guantanamo.
Fortunately, the answer is obvious. Congress should pass, and the president sign, legislation making Guantanamo the 51st state.(click on the title to read the rest of this great op-ed... from Gitmo attorney Peter Ryan...)
WILL THE MEDIA SHOW ONCE AGAIN THEIR COLLECTIVE AMNESIA??
LEST WE FORGET.... they said the same thing last time the supreme court was getting ready to rule... I fell for it in 2006 before the Supreme Court released the Hamdan decision... Bush announced "I want to close Guantanamo... I am just waiting for the Supreme court to rule..." I of course knew he didn't have to wait for the supreme court's ruling to close the place but I figured he would use it as an excuse...
He didn't.... he never intended to close the place but many people believed him and still ask me, "Aren't we closing the place? I thought Bush said he was closing the place?"
I will not fall for that crock again... but the big question is, will the media fall for it again??