Sunday, June 7, 2009

NY times' second mea culpa

I guess the more they try to explain it the angrier I get. Now if you read the latest excuses (click on the title) you will find this little gem.... "Bumiller said she made sure there was language signaling controversy in the second paragraph." So now we are being "signaled" that a story might be a pack of lies? They really don't get it do they? Reporters are supposed to investigate... not parrot and "signal controversy".... but I guess that was in the old days.


the talking dog said...

Expecting accuracy in reporting is "pre-9-11 thinking." Along with so much els.

Anonymous said...

Reporters are minions of the machine since 911. Didn't you know?