Obama and FISA...fading into the right wing...

The Rude Pundit (http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2008/06/fisa-failure-and-sodomy-of-patriots.html)
on FISA: "The truly complex, difficult position is to say, 'No, you sons and daughters of bitches, you don't give up the very things that make us Americans.' See, 'Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death' isn't a conditional phrase. It ain't 'Well, Give Me the Liberties You Think I Oughta Have As Long As It's Balanced With Your Tortured Legalistic Definitions and Limitations On the Constitution, But, Hey, As Long As You Tell Me We're Still Free, It's All Cool, Yo.'" And he goes on to say what Obama should be saying.
Via http://sideshow.me.uk/
I wish I knew how to make real links so you could just click on them but I only seem to be able to do that on occasion... maybe it is a full moon thing...but you can click on the title to get to rudepundit and you can paste the link to sideshow into your browser.

Redacted Parhat Decision Released

Last week I wrote about a decision by the DC Court of Appeals in one of the Guantanamo cases. The Circuit Court ordered the release of Uigher Parhat because the Government did not show by a preponderance of the evidence that this man was/is an enemy to the United States. Click on the title to read the decision. I am still reading so I cannot comment further except to say that it looks like at least one panel of the DC Circuit Court has figured out that the DOJ has little, if any, credibility.

STOP THE FISA BILL

PLEASE HEED DAN'S PLEA:

I think it's incredibly important to make as much noise as possible between now and then to give us the best possible chance to get telecom amnesty stripped. I've also added the link to FaxZero and Senator Obama's fax # to my "Join The Fight Against Retroactive Immunity" section. Please spread the word if so inspired. Thanks, Dan Fejes Pruning Shears http://pruningshears.us

Justice Scalia and the Urban Legend

Thanks to Seton Hall for once again examining the facts surrounding the Guantanamo Myth that claims (according to Justice Scalia's unsupported and unsupportable ramblings in his Boumediene dissent) that 30 men released from Guantanamo have "returned" to the battlefield. Click on the title to read the report.

21st anniversary of the Convention against torture

Click on the title to read a little more about Thursday's anniversary on cab drollery which also noted that Friday was the U.N. International Day in Support of Victims of Torture.
So how did I celebrate these particular milestones?
I watched the confirmation of charges at the Internatioal Criminal Court in The Hague against two accused war criminals from the Congo: Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui. As I listened to the horrific crimes these men are accused of masterminding I couldn't help but think of two other men who I hope will be siting in those same seats one day: Bush and Cheney. In fact Mr. Ngudjolo Chui often sat with that same dazed and cocky expression we often see on Bush's face and Mr. Katanga sat the whole time with a sneer on his face that rivals Cheney's permanent expression.
If you want to read more about these war criminals (the Congolese torturers not the US ones) paste the link below into your browser and follow the links on that page:
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/06/icc-holds-confirmation-of-charges.php

I will write more about my 3 months as a visiting professional at the International Criminal Court in the coming weeks, my visiting position ends on the 4th of July.

Canadian Court holds Canada implicated in US torture of then 16 year old Khadr

A Canadian judge released another interesting decision in the Omar Khadr saga today. Pursuant to the Supreme Court of Canada's earlier order to disclose documents to Khadr's attorneys the Judge ordered Canada to give the lawyers a document which indicates that when Canadian agents went to gitmo to interrogate Khadr in Feb 2003, a US official at gitmo described certain treatment that they (the US officials) had inflicted on the 16 year old Khadr in order to "prepare" him for the Canadian interrogations. The judge then proceeded to find that this treatment constituted torture. The Judge went on to find that Canada is "implicated" in that torture since they continued with the interrogation despite knowledge that this torture had been inflicted. The Judge does not disclose what the treatment was, but he has ordered Canada to disclose the document to Khadr's attorneys.

So basically a judge has found that the US tortured Omar at Guantanamo when he was only 16.

Decision is here, interesting part starts at para 72 and continues to at least 88:

http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/rss/DES-1-08%20Decision.pdf

Parhat Victory

Although we do not know the details yet there was a victory in the DC Circuit Court on friday and the order (but not the details) was released today. Click on the title to read the Order and as soon as the censors release the details I will post a link to that as well.
Listen to the NPR story here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91819101


Thanks to PEGC for providing the link ( http://www.pegc.us )

Denied without prejudice

The Supreme Court just denied Al-Ghizzawi's original habeas petition without prejudice... meaning he is free to pursue in the District Court...
Sigh.

An Open Letter to My Senators (Obama and Durbin) on the so called "FISA Compromise"

As an attorney representing two men being held at Guantanamo I have been subjected to government surveillance of both my work and home phones. I take this so called "compromise" personally. Click on the title to see the letter that I have sent to my two senators... and please contact your representatives and senators this morning and tell them you oppose this bill strongly. Now.

MILITARY TORTURE DOCUMENTS RELEASED TODAY

If you haven't actually looked at these you should (click on the title). Pay special attention to Page 9... where we model our torture after the N. Koreans (diet manipulation) and pages 13-16 where we talk about how to cover this up.... you know... so history won't figure this out.
I have to admit I can't read it all at once so I may add some other pages to highlight later.

ABOUT THOSE BAD APPLES

They were lawyers not low level soldiers.... click on the title and read what McClatchy has to say. (I have joined the protest against citing to the AP check out "UnAssociated Press" .)

LET THE GAMES BEGIN... AGAIN?

It has been less than a week... the Supreme Court has again declared that the men at Gitmo have rights, not very many mind you... but a few important ones. Like the right to know why they are being held and the right to defend themselves against whatever accusations might be made against them.... rights that have been accepted by civilized countries for hundreds of years, and known in the legal world as the writ of habeas corpus.
Now that our Supreme Court has again told our nation (and the world) that Habeas Corpus still exists in the United States... if only by a thread ... we have people like John McCain threatening new legislation so we can continue to hold men indefinitely without charge ... And we have a judiciary in the District Court of D.C. wondering how can they handle this "massive" litigation. (This "massive litigation" is less than 300 men... small beans for our federal court.)
One thing that has been clear over these many years is that our federal courts are in mortal fear of ruling on these cases. They are in fear of challenging our executive...
The last few days have shown that the district court in DC would very much like an out... they don't want these cases and they don't want to rule on these cases... They remain paralyzed and it is unclear who will provide the necessary guidance to get actual movement on the habeas cases.

Back at the beginning of 2005 the then commander at Guantanamo, Major General Jay Hood, acknowledged to The Wall Street Journal that: “Sometimes we just didn’t get the right folks,” and that the reason those “folks” were still in Guantanamo was that “[n]obody wants to be the one to sign the release papers . . . . There’s no muscle in the system.” General Hood added that there were “significant numbers of men here” who he expected would be transferred to their home governments or released, and that ‘[i]f that doesn’t happen, I’m going to be doing some yelling.” (Wall Street Journal, Jan. 26, 2005).

General Jay Hood left his post at Guantanamo that same year and he never did do any yelling... there is still no muscle in the system and if the last few days are any indication our judges in the District Court don't want to be the ones to sign the release papers...

And so, despite the wonderful and eloquent decision of Justice Kennedy, the question for me remains:
Will Mr. Al-Ghizzawi remain in Guantanamo without charges? Will Mr. Al-Ghizzawi ever get a Habeas Corpus hearing?
Will Mr. Al-Ghizzawi ever see anything resembling justice at the hands of my country?

Returning to The Battlefield.... The Myth Lives On

In March of 2007 I wrote a piece for HuffingtonPost on the Myth of the return to the battlefield. I started out by saying:

Why bother to do fact checking when it is so much easier to just write down whatever you are told? Every time I read or hear about the ever-changing number of Guantánamo prisoners that have "returned to the battlefield" I try to research this issue yet again. The Pentagon, Cheney, Rumsfeld and various others have, at different times, claimed that 12, 4, 15, 10, 7 and even twenty-some Guantánamo prisoners have "returned to the battlefield." The administration and the military frequently use this "fact" to bolster their rationale for keeping the Guantánamo facility open. However, when asked for the identities of these men things get a little hazy... for some reason they don't want to tell us. They want us to just trust them on this one... Been there, done that. Since the government provides few specifics to support this claim it is hard to challenge them. That should not mean however that journalists have to keep covering the lies as though they are true.

I then went on to check the facts.... click on the title if you are interested in knowing.

One thing has changed in the intervening fifteen months. One man, who had been cleared by the military and released three years ago was involved in a suicide bombing a month or so ago. I guess it was bound to happen...that one of the men held at Guantanamo would eventually be involved in violence. But again, and despite Scalia's great fear of the men held at Guantanamo, this is the only man we know of who actually was set free and engaged in violence. I for one find this pretty amazing.

More than 500 men have been quietly released from Guantanamo in the middle of the night and sent home. Why? Because they should not have been held by us in the first place. These are men who were picked up in return for bounties. The military's own records confirm that the vast majority of them were no where near a battlefield. In fact, our military often didn't even know their names or what they were accused of doing. Frankly, we didn't care. Our government wanted it to look like we were doing something.

Our Supreme Court has spoken and as a friend of mine pointed out "I hope that people will take careful notice of the court's words. A fragile line was drawn between freedom and tyranny." It is time we take our fragile line and try to move forward as a country.

Voting Republican

Yesterday we saw many of the right wing nuts explaining why the Supreme Court was wrong in their decision to uphold our Constitution. With that in mind I share this about voting republican.

And a few words from Dylan...

This is from Chris Floyd's site... but because I couldn't figure out how to do a link to the actual Dylan blog I just copied the whole thing... you tube and all. Click on the title and you can go to the frontpage of Chris Floyds' site.

Foreign Policy and Military Procurement in Perspective
Preview content | Read more...

Close

And now, a few words on foreign policy and military procurement from a prominent American currently visiting Europe (Vienna, June 10):