Friday, January 20, 2012
Spain re-opens war crimes investigation regarding Guantanamo---
Scott Horton has more on this issue here.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Petition Request from Human Rights First
President Obama pledged to close the Guantanamo
Bay prison three years ago. In the last presidential election, the
major candidates all agreed that Guantanamo had undermined U.S. legitimacy and
national security and endangered our troops abroad, and that the prison should
be shuttered.
Ten years after it opened, the Guantanamo prison still holds 171
prisoners, at a cost of $800,000 each every year.
Please
sign this petition urging the United States government to close the
Guantanamo Bay detention facility once and for all. If it receives 25,000
signatures, the White House has promised to respond. Click
here to sign it now!
Sincerely,
Daphne Eviatar,
Human Rights First
Human Rights First
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
and my thoughts on this "anniversary"...
as found on Michael Moore's website:
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/guantanamos-dark-10th-anniversary
If you are in the DC area I hope to see you out there protesting this ominous anniversary in front of the white house tomorrow (january 11)....but wherever you are- raise your voice and tell Obama to follow through...at least on this one promise... to close Guantanamo.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/guantanamos-dark-10th-anniversary
If you are in the DC area I hope to see you out there protesting this ominous anniversary in front of the white house tomorrow (january 11)....but wherever you are- raise your voice and tell Obama to follow through...at least on this one promise... to close Guantanamo.
Thank you U.S. Supreme Court (sigh...)
For confirming that the men at Guantanamo do not have the right to participate in their appeals... Sorry I can't post to the decision but it was just a one liner anyway....DENIED.
This was in response to the Writ of Mandamus that I filed in the U. S. Supreme Court asking them to Order the DC Circuit Court to provide an unclassified version of the documents that I filed on behalf of my client in his habeas hearing so that he could participate in his appeal.
Now it is clear- all the way up to the Supreme Court- that the men at Guantanamo cannot even help with their cases in any meaningful way....
This was in response to the Writ of Mandamus that I filed in the U. S. Supreme Court asking them to Order the DC Circuit Court to provide an unclassified version of the documents that I filed on behalf of my client in his habeas hearing so that he could participate in his appeal.
Now it is clear- all the way up to the Supreme Court- that the men at Guantanamo cannot even help with their cases in any meaningful way....
Guantanamo lawyers statement on this 10th anniversary
This statement is made by over
100 lawyers who have represented or currently represent men imprisoned at
Guantánamo Bay in federal habeas corpus proceedings. We are solo practitioners,
partners and associates in law firms, federal public defenders and former
prosecutors, law professors and human rights activists who practice in nearly
every area of the law. We hail from nearly every state in the Union. We stand
here together on this, the tenth anniversary of the opening of the prison at
Guantánamo, to call on our government to provide meaningful justice for the 171
men still held there.
Ten years ago, the first men
and boys were shipped secretly from different parts of the world to Guantánamo,
and ultimately the number grew to nearly 800. The government called these
individuals “enemy combatants,” a term without legal meaning, in order to evade
established rules of international law, to impose indefinite imprisonment
without any legal process whatsoever and to employ unlawful interrogation
techniques and even torture. It tried to
make the prison camp a “legal black hole” where the sanitizing light of due
process and the rule of law would not penetrate. It said that all the Guantánamo
prisoners were “terrorists” and even “the worst of the worst,” in order to
justify their unjust incarceration.
As attorneys for the prisoners,
we have worked hard to show that these government claims are wrong. We have
litigated dozens of cases, filed thousands of legal briefs, fought all the way
to the U.S. Supreme Court — three times so far — to establish that these men
cannot be indefinitely imprisoned without due process of law and that this
prison is not outside the law. We continue to fight for these fundamental
principles enshrined by the U.S. Constitution and international human rights
law.
These same principles animate
our demands now. Every one of the 171 men remaining at Guantánamo deserves the
due process of law. First, every one whom the government still holds captive
should be charged criminally, and provided a fair trial, or released. The
Constitution, as well as international human rights law, require no less.
Second, over half of these men were cleared for repatriation to their home
countries, some years ago, and they should be repatriated or resettled promptly.
No law, no logic, can allow a government to continue to imprison individuals
whom that government itself has said pose no threat.
We have shown why these men are
not “the worst of the worst.” In court filings and in news articles, the
evidence shows that many of them were sold for bounties, or falsely accused by
those who were being tortured, or simply captured in the fog of war because they
were at the wrong place at the wrong time. The fact that 600 of the nearly 800
men once imprisoned at Guantánamo were
unilaterally released by the government proves that the rhetoric was false,
base fear mongering. In any case, the important point is this — a court should
determine each man’s guilt or innocence after a fair criminal trial, and a
decade is too long to wait for such a trial.
We have learned and wish to
remind the world of the human dignity of our clients, based on countless hours
we have spent in conversation with them. They are not nameless, faceless “terrorists.”
They are fathers, brothers, and sons to family members who have not seen them
in a decade, and they feel the deepest pain from missing their loved ones back
home. They have endured an unthinkable ordeal including, in a great many cases,
torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. They have also
endured prolonged isolation and other brutal conditions of imprisonment,
causing many to deteriorate physically and psychologically. In addition, they
face the most profound uncertainty about their futures and experience the daily
grinding weight of the hopelessness that pervades Guantánamo. Yet they manage
to preserve their humanity and dignity against all odds, in the most surprising
and inspiring ways. We ask the world to remember our clients on this day and
the remaining days of their imprisonment.
As Americans we know that the
rule of law is one of the greatest accomplishments of our nation. We call on
the government to respect the rule of law and end our disastrous and shameful
legacy in Guantánamo Bay. We call on President Obama and our government to promptly
repatriate or resettle the prisoners
who have already been approved for release, and to provide prompt and fair criminal
trials for those whom the government still holds. Our fundamental
Constitutional principles require no less. Ten years is too long. We hope that
this tenth anniversary of the Guantánamo Bay prison will be its last.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
IN THE CATEGORY OF WTF???
I guess someone should mention this to the Afghani men being held at Guantanamo because of their connection to the Taliban.....
KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Saturday welcomed remarks from the Obama administration that the Taliban were not necessarily America's enemies. Earlier this month, Vice President Joe Biden said in an interview with Newsweek magazine that the Islamist militants did not represent a threat to U.S. interests unless they continued to shelter al-Qaida. "Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy. That's critical. There is not a single statement that the president has ever made in any of our policy assertions that the Taliban is our enemy because it threatens U.S. interests," Biden was quoted as saying by Newsweek.... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2076564/Taliban-enemy-says-Joe-Biden-US-negotiate-deal-end-Afghanistan-war.html
Thursday, December 29, 2011
SETTING THE TONE FOR THE NEW YEAR
That is what the military is doing at Guantanamo right now....in a way they are only codifying what we all knew to be a fact: that the military commission system for trying the men at Guantanamo stinks to high heaven and has not a shred of legitimacy. The powers to be have now decreed that all legal mail between the detainees being tried in the military commission and their attorneys will be read by the military, department of justice, the janitor and whomever else is hanging about. Fitting start for the "new"....kinder, gentler....kangaroo system.
read the Order here.
read the Order here.
Saturday, December 24, 2011
From Roger Fitch and our Friends down under....
The Republican dream
ROGER FITCH ESQ • THURSDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2011
Congressional fat cats ... Corporate crime and financial defalcation ... Constitutional violations ... Gridlock on judicial and ambassadorial nominations ... Roger Fitch surveys the Washington landscape
.....
Heedless of all this corporate crime and financial defalcation, Congress is busy stripping law courts of jurisdiction over citizens and others the government calls "enemy combatants" due to their "terrorism", although terrorism, like banking, is hardly a military matter.
It's hard to count the ways the National Defense Authorization Act violates the Constitution, but one might start with Article III, Section 2:
"The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed."
That might permit a civilian trial at Guantánamo, except for the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed..."
Anyway, military jurisdiction over civilians isn't a given, according to law prof Steve Vladeck.
This latest Pentagon pre-emption of civilian justice is opposed - by the Pentagon, the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA, the FBI and the Justice Department.
Japanese-Americans don't think much of it, either, but nothing seems likely to stop Congressshort of a presidential veto.
One senator wants to bring back torture.
CLICK HERE TO READ THE WHOLE FITCH......
Monday, December 19, 2011
BE THERE OR BE SQUARE- OCCUPY DC JANUARY 2-12
ANTI-TORTURE
ACTIVISTS TO “OCCUPY”
WASHINGTON,
JAN. 2-12
MARKING
TENTH ANNIVERSARY OF GUANTANAMO, EVENTS TO INCLUDE 10-DAY FAST, COURTROOM
SUPPORT FOR ACTIVISTS WHO SPOKE OUT IN CONGRESS, AND A HUMAN CHAIN FROM THE
WHITE HOUSE TO CONGRESS
WASHINGTON, D.C. — January 11 will mark the tenth anniversary of the first detainees' arrival at the U.S.-controlled detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. To remember this travesty, Witness Against Torture is planning 10 days of activities in Washington, D.C. demanding an end to torture and indefinite detention at Guantanamo, Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, and elsewhere, and that the president reject the just-passed National Defense Authorization Act.
Jan. 2-12: WAT sponsors Hungering for Justice, a 10-day fast highlighting the ongoing crimes at Guantanamo and Bagram. Dozens of activists are expected to participate in the fast in Washington as well as other cities. Locations of daily activities in support of the fast to be announced.
Jan. 3: The jury trial of 14 anti-torture activists is scheduled to begin in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Moultrie Courthouse, 500 Indiana Ave., N.W. In June 2011, the 14 stood one by one in the Gallery of the House of Representatives to petition lawmakers to uphold the Constitution by not making funding for Guantanamo permanent. WAT will stand with the 14 in the court room, outside the courthouse, and around the city as their trial proceeds.
Jan. 11: A dramatic Human Chain from the White House to the Capitol Building marks the
10th anniversary of detention at Guantanamo. WAT joins a broad coalition of human rights groups in sponsoring this vigil, which will begin after a noontime rally in Lafayette Park. During the rally and vigil, activists will be wearing orange jumpsuits and holding signs and other visuals demanding that the detention center be closed.
“Despite his campaign pledge to shut down Guantanamo, President Obama has continued the Bush administration's practice of indefinite military detention there and at Bagram,” says Jeremy Varon, professor of history at the New School and an organizer with WAT. “Now, Obama says he will sign the National Defense Authorization Act, which extends this abusive regime by allowing the president to order U.S. citizens, as well, to be held indefinitely without due process on American soil. Not one more year – not one more day – of such policies is acceptable. Witness Against Torture is here in Washington to add our message to the 'Occupy' movement's call for a return to a just political and economic system by demanding an end to the national disgrace that is Guantanamo.”
Witness Against Torture is a grassroots movement that came into being in December 2005 when 24 activists walked to Guantanamo to visit the prisoners and condemn torture policies. Since then, it has engaged in public education, community outreach, and non-violent direct action. January 2012 will be the sixth year the group has “occupied” Washington, DC to call for justice, accountability and mercy. To learn more, visitwww.witnesstorture.org
Friday, December 16, 2011
Amnesty International on Guantanamo
Follow this link to Amnesty's latest report on Guantanamo....a decade of damage to human rights.
Defense department authorization act.....
For those of you who are wondering exactly how bad this new law is...the one that Obama is going to sign into law very soon I will put some links to things to read that will bring you up to date. The bottom line is that Obama not only bought into Guantanamo but has now expanded the concept to include U. S. citizens....This has been a slippery slope since 2001 but instead of slowing things down Obama has put soap on the slide.
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_about_the_detention_bill/singleton/
Emptywheel has a few good posts about it...start here:
http://www.emptywheel.net/2011/12/14/obama-will-not-veto-defense-authorization/
The talking dog has some thoughts on this too:
http://www.thetalkingdog.com/archives2/001603.html
As Senator Franken said, this was not a good way of celebrating the birthday of the bill of rights.....
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_about_the_detention_bill/singleton/
Emptywheel has a few good posts about it...start here:
http://www.emptywheel.net/2011/12/14/obama-will-not-veto-defense-authorization/
The talking dog has some thoughts on this too:
http://www.thetalkingdog.com/archives2/001603.html
As Senator Franken said, this was not a good way of celebrating the birthday of the bill of rights.....
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Saturday, November 26, 2011
From Roger Fitch and our friends down under at Justinian
Land of the brave
Monday, November 21, 2011
Justinian in Roger Fitch Esq
Justinian in Roger Fitch Esq
Former general counsel of the CIA under
investigation over drone attack "murder" remark ... War crimes don't
need a war (apparently) ... Novel offences likely to remain on the books ...
Ideological Republican circuit judges flout the Supreme Court ... Our Man in
Washington reports
"Aside
from the humanitarian aspects, it is well known that, under excruciating
torture, a prisoner will admit almost any suggested crime. Such confessions
are, of course, not admissible in trials in civilized nations... Some of our
leaders have found that it is easy to forgo human rights for those who are
considered to be subhuman, or 'enemy combatants'."
Jimmy Carter, the last American
president moderately attached to human rights

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)